Autore: lowenergies

We know a lot about “violent” energies (high energies); let’s try to analyze the “soft” or “low energy” energies better.

If we imagined for a moment to free ourselves from the high energies we would see everything oscillate: electromagnetic waves, atoms, electrons. In many cases this is very difficult to perceive because these oscillations mix with each other are not all the same. It is like in the rough sea: it becomes very difficult to distinguish the single waves because some are longer than others (they have different wavelength / frequency), some are higher than others (they have different intensity / energy), some come before and others come later (they have different phases). The mixture of all these waves completely looses the sense of undulatory motion and the sea takes on a restless appearance. Mathematically (through Fourier series developments) it is possible to study resulting disordered waves in a combination of regular waves. An interesting example is that of sound waves. We generally hear noises and do not play. With the Fourier series developments it is possible to break down the resulting disordered sound waves that give rise to a certain noise in a series of elementary waves. By generating electronically elementary waves with height and frequency corresponding to the disturbing components but with half-wavelength phase shifts, it is possible to generate destructive interferences such as to cancel all the disturbing components. Techniques that exploit this phenomenon allow you to restructure music tracks recorded many years ago, eliminate noise in HI-FI recordings, cancel annoying noises, etc.

The quantum electrodynamics allows to study the oscillation of electromagnetic waves generated by external sources, atomic, nuclear and sub-nuclear particles and the interaction between waves and particles.

It becomes too long to go into the details of these very fascinating topics that allow you to physically explain many phenomena some very well known, others may be less. For example, many optical phenomena (light diffusion, reflection, absorption, polarization, refraction, bi-refraction, doppler effect, aberration, resonance, color vision, etc.), laser cooling, superconductivity, supersolidity, are all phenomena well described by quantum electrodynamics.

I am interested in investigating the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and electrons of water molecules.

But before venturing into this path, perhaps we need to know the water molecule better and discover that water shows at least 70 anomalies compared to other substances.

In this journey, perhaps long but fascinating, we will meet people like Jean-Baptiste van Helmont and his studies on gas (*), Rudolph Arthur Marcus and his studies on electrotransfer, Enzo Tiezzi, Sven Jørgensen and Ilya Prigogine on the coherent oscillation of electrons almost free of water with the basic electromagnetic field, Luc Montagner and the hormesis, Zengjorgj and bioenergetics, Otto Einrich Warburg and the substitution of putrefative oxido-reductive reactions, Gerald Pollack and the fourth phase of the water, Ernst Heinrich Weber and Gustav Theodor Fechner and the discovery of the logarithmic relationship between the response to a stimulus and the stimulus itself, Mario Pincherle and the theory of Zed, Emilio del Giudice and the coherence domains, etc.

 

(*) (From Wikipedia) The term gas was coined by van Helmont in 1630. It seems to derive from the transcription of his pronunciation of the Greek word χάος (chàos), which he made to become geist; but Weigand and Scheler traced the etymological origin to the German gascht (fermentation): so it would be, according to them, initially used by the chemist van Helmont to indicate the vinous fermentation. Leaving aside the etymology, we know for sure that van Helmont was the first to postulate the existence of distinct substances in the air. A few years later Boyle stated that the air was atoms and emptiness and only after 140 years the statements of Boyle and van Helmont will prove true.

Turin (Italy)
Gianfranco Pellegrini

In English two different words are used to distinguish rispectively the scalar velocity from the vectorial velocity; in fact they call the first “speed” and the second “velocity”. I draw inspiration from this consideration to emphasize that so that there is no change (forces, variations of energy), it is not enough that the “speed” remains unchanged, it is also necessary that the “velocity” remains constant. Just change the direction or the angle of motion, even if the “speed” remains unchanged. In the uniform circular motion the speed is constant while the velocity is not. A point that oscillates between one and the other extremes points of a segment (even imagining that at the extreme instantaneous steps from “speed” + v to “speed” -v or vice versa) is another example. So the circular motions, the oscillating ones and, more generally all the periodic motions, even when the “speed” remains constant, generate change.

In nature there are two manifestations of energy that coexist and manifest themselves in every place and in every situation: a first form that I would call “strong” and a second form that I would call “soft”. The first one is able to “move” una tantum a large “energy packages” in a short time, while the second “displaces” small “energy packages” repeatedly (cyclically) and continuously. The first one, due to its characteristics, can only be “exoteric” while the latter is more “esoteric”.

The “strong” energy, to manifest itself spontaneously, needs a “Δ” of any kind (pressure, height, temperature) to the point that one could say: “give me a” Δ “and I will lift the world” (*) and not necessarily must be cyclic. I call it “strong” because the energy generated by combustion (and more ine generaly, exothermical chemical reactions), the nuclear energy, the energy generated by a hydraulic turbine or a wind turbine, or that generated by wave motion, by catastrophic events. (volcanoes, earthquakes, meteorite falls, etc.) are all forms of “violent”, “destructive”, “entropic” energy.

At the same time a form of less visible and “delicate” energy is always present and, even when it sometimes is defined as “destructive”, at most it reduces its effect to zero but in general it is always, at least partially “constructive” and, above all, antientropic. This form of energy is the only one able to well explain the energy exchanges related to biology, life, evolution and, to my modest opinion, more generally also to other aspects of social, psychological, etc.

It is also the only form of energy that is independent of the space-time “cage”, admitting also phenomena not necessarily linked to the cause-effect chain.

This second form of “soft” energy is well known to scientists involved in quantum mechanics and, more specifically, quantum electrodynamics. It is time to “clear it” and make it known to everyone.

Turin (Italy)

Gianfranco Pellegrini

(*) According to the legend Archimedes of Syracuse said: “Give me a lever and I will raise the world”.

It is often said that the human body is made up of about 70% of water. It should be specified that the percentage mentioned is the percentage by weight. I try to clarify the concept that I would like to express with a simple example. The human body (but the same applies to any other living being) consists of water molecules, inorganic molecules (iron, phosphorus, calcium, potassium, etc.) and organic molecules (carbohydrates, fats, proteins, etc.). ). The amount by weight of inorganic substances is negligible while the organic substances make up about 30% by weight (in trees with woody trunk this percentage can rise even more than 60% but for the continuation of the reasoning little changes).From a rough estimate I found that on average an organic molecule weighs about 400 times more than one molecule of water (I have not made a calculation too precise because it is useless for the purposes of the reasoning I want to do). To make an analogy, if we compare a molecule of water with a grain of sand of about 1 mm³ of volume and about 3 milligrams of weight, a stone compared to an organic molecule on average should have a volume of about 4 cm³ and weigh about 12 grams. Imagine taking a vessel (which in the analogy represents our human body) and filling it with 700 grams of sand and 300 grams of stones. The question is as follows: How many grains of sand and how many stones are contained in the vessel? An initial answer is: 233,000 sand grains and 25 stones. A second answer is: 99.99% are grains of sand and 0.01% are stones.Well, in the case of the human body we can say exactly the same thing: 99.99% are water molecules and the remaining 0.01% is made up of organic molecules; with the difference that the water molecule is unique while the organic molecules are multiple.Anyone who approaches chemistry knows that the number of molecules involved and not their percentage by weight is important. The first question that arises spontaneously is: if we are so “diluted”, why are not we “puddles”? For example, sea water, although much less diluted than our body is liquid.From these considerations on understands the importance of water in the human body and, more generally, in living beings. It is therefore a question of better investigating the role played by water.

Turin (Italy)

Gianfranco Pellegrini

Quantum mechanics has not been accepted by all physicists, even though scientists at the school in Copenhagen have been added more and more. An important example of a scientist is Einstein who, together with Podolskj and Rosen, enunciated the following paradox: “If the laws of quantum physics are true, we can deduce that two particles that are in resonance with each other because they are the fragments of a single particle that has split and whose two fragments have moved away from each other, then, if I do something about one of the two particles, instantly even the other feels its effect; but this violates the principle of causality and this can not therefore be, from this conclusion we can deduce that quantum physics can not be true.”

In short, Einstein – and with him a minority of physicists of the last century – was afraid to overcome the concept of cause and effect (what Prof. Vitiello calls “ontological prejudice”).

In reality, Bohr and all the physicists defending quantum mechanics have always responded by claiming that the experimental results confirmed the theory without going any further. They too did not dare to overcome the concept of cause and effect.

Finally in 1964 John Stewart Bell enunciates this theorem which is a stupendous masterpiece of logic:

“The following set of 3 statements is logically incompatible so that one of the following 3 statements must necessarily fall:

1) physical reality is described by quantum physics

2) physical reality is susceptible to objective description (ie independent of the observer)

3) physical reality is describable as a set of events located in space and time”

Einstein and company preferred to reject the statement n. 1).

Bohr and company did not want to renounce the space-temporality and have made the n. 2) claiming that the observer influences the experiment by making him lose objectivity (Eisemberg’s uncertainty principle).

For example, the phenomenon of superconduction is an exclusively quantum effect.

The largest superconducting cable in the world, installed on a north-south axis in the LIPA infrastructure in Holbrook, USA, can transport 574 MVA at full load, sufficient to supply electricity to 300,000 apartments !! The size of this cable is such that it no longer allows us to claim that the particles involved in the experiment are so small that the experiments are influenced by the laboratory. What to answer Bell in cases like these?

Finally in this century (to go by Boehm) physicists make the n. 3) paving the way for the synchronization of events at a distance and the overcoming of space-temporality !!! A real Copernican revolution that overcomes the ontological prejudice !!!!

This is a huge achievement. In fact, with the fall of this prejudice, the road to physics opens up to concepts such as bilocation, synchronization of events at a distance (thus exceeding the speed limit of light), etc.

Turin (Italy)

Gianfranco Pellegrini

Goodmorning everyone,

I decided to create this blog in order to share with you the results of the studies I have been doing for more than 20 years on the water in all its manifestations. To begin with, I would like to share three key words that are fundamental to me for what I will share with you:

– awareness

– clairvoyance

– holism

The word awareness, at least in Italy, is very abused so much that it has lost much of its meaning. Awareness is a very important fact that must generate in us a sense of immense amazement so that we can make significant progress in knowledge. When in the Christian texts it uses the word “effatà” (the ears open) we want to signify that we have a sudden illumination so important that we change ourselves. The awareness for me really wants to have this meaning.

Even the word clairvoyance, at least in Italy, has lost its original meaning and is now used to indicate the activity of magicians, sorcerers and soothsayers. For me it means instead “see clearly” free the mind from the fog and clear your ideas. It is clear that in a process of deepening, every time we arrive at an apparent level of deepening we realize that we need to start over with a level of deeper knowledge a bit like with the Russian doll. There comes a certain level of depth in which you can also describe the profane concepts that at first seemed very complicated. This means that it is starting to become clairvoyant.

Finally, the word holism has recently begun to have such an important meaning for me. The “randomness” (the “distracted” people call it that) wanted me to be born in a place full of water sources and this convinces me that the visceral love I feel for this substance is due to that. In my university studies, “randomness” wanted me to delve into higher mathematics and quantum mechanics. Subsequently, the “randomness” always made me occupy myself at a professional level of scientific research in the thermodynamic field which is my current job. But at the hobby level I have always deepened the themes of water from all its points of view because it is in love and fascinated by it. Unknowingly I have always distinguished “living water” from the rest of the water by attributing special powers to it. In recent years, thanks to the study of water with quantum electrodynamics I entered the world of low energy and began to become aware of many phenomena that, in addition to the consequences in theoretical physics, also have in molecular biology, on the cycle of life, on evolution, in sociology, etc. I have seen the phenomena in a more and more clear way (clairvoyance) so much to see now unequivocally the close connection between inanimate and animated world and between physics and other disciplines. My vision of things and the world has become precisely holistic. This is why I feel the need to share many concepts that I have received, as well as with experts in physics such as myself, even with experts in biology, biochemistry, sociology, psychology, neuroscience… I hope with this blog to succeed!

Turin (Italy)

Gianfranco Pellegrini